TY -的A2 -斯,伊恩·l . AU -长Viseth AU -短,马修AU -史密斯,斯宾塞盟——Senechal马丁AU -布沙尔,丹尼尔·r . PY - 2019 DA - 2019/06/11 TI -测试Bioimpedance估计身体脂肪百分比在不同腰围臀部和SP - 7624253六世- 2019 AB -许多研究验证使用Bioimpedance分析(BIA)量化身体脂肪百分比(BF %)。但是,如果一些模型类型(即它是未知的。脚,手,脚,手,脚)是不同的在他们的有效性取决于臀部和腰围。本研究的目的是比较BF % 3 BIA模型之间的差异(即。脚,手,脚,手,脚)对Bod吊舱在不同的臀部和腰围。共有92人在这项研究中加入了19岁- 72岁。后预试程序推荐BIA措施后,BF %估计使用三种BIA模型和Bod舱。臀部和腰围使用标准程序和tertiles计算得到。Bland-Altman是策划和1示例t检验以及相关性的平均测量和之间的区别这两个指标进行了测试。在整个样本,所有BIA模型,Bland-Altman分析显示显著差异比0和比例的显著差异。 However, when stratified by tertiles, the two measurements were only significant for the highest tertiles of hip and waist for all BIA apparatus (all p <0.01) and the proportional bias was nonsignificant for all tertiles and across all BIA apparatus. For the highest tertile of waist and hip, the average difference was between 1.67% and 3.29% compared with the Bod Pod estimation. In conclusion, the three BIA models offer a BF% measurement agreeing with the estimation obtained with the Bod Pod with the exception of people having a greater waist or greater hip. SN - 2356-7651 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7624253 DO - 10.1155/2019/7624253 JF - Journal of Sports Medicine PB - Hindawi KW - ER -