这个特殊的问题旨在概述新技术的使用对中风患者的康复。它包含两个评论和七个原始研究。有一个通用的m . Iosa和同事约七有前途的技术对中风康复:机器人,大脑计算机接口、无创性脑刺激器,neuroprostheses,虚拟现实,可穿戴设备和平板电脑。更具体的审查是e .问:范Delden双边上肢和同事约20种不同的设备培训。上肢康复也是g . Thielman研究的对象和p . Bonsall报告结合使用不同的技术,如单方面机械设备用于与一个虚拟交互任务监控,结合听觉生物反馈对提高躯干的控制。还p .出售等人的研究集中在使用上肢康复机器人,他们的情况下使用单边设备设计的手康复。积极成果被发现在所有这些研究中,表明机械设备可以提供一个有用的扩展现有形式的疗法,也说明本文通过e .问:范Delden和同事。但这个特殊的问题不仅是集中在机械设备。a·r·鲍尔斯和他的同事们调查了通过司机行车检测性能与使用斜外围棱镜偏盲。g·马龙和他的同事的研究表明,使用neuroprosthesis的潜力不仅对纠正脚掉在慢性阶段,而且对改善感觉运动再学习在亚急性期中风康复期间,促进步态恢复。 P. J. Manns and R. G. Haennel investigated the use of a wearable device for assessing walking capacity in people after stroke in terms of energy expenditure and step measurement, concluding that this device is not enough accurate as step counter. So not all technologies can be used also in stroke population, and not in a nonspecific manner. The study of A. Fusco and colleagues, in fact, analysed three different montages of the electrodes of transcranial direct current stimulation, suggesting different effects among anodal montage acting on manual dexterity, cathodal montage improving manual force, and bilateral montage, the less effective. Also, G. Thielman and P. Bonsall suggested that the degree of changes varied per protocol and may be due to the appropriateness of the technique chosen, as well as based on patients impairments.